In her 1994 Miss Universe questionnaire round, Miss India Sushmita
Sen revealed that she has two sides to herself – a private side for self and one
public side for others. This answer brings focus to an interesting observation:
Can we assign Introversion and Extroversion to two separate baskets with no
overlap?
The general feeling among Indians related to this aspect of personality
is somewhat surprising. From the past couple of decades or so, Indians
generally felt uncomfortable and awkward around introverts. Most often one
would find elders dishing out advices to introverts to talk more and be more
like his/her extrovert friend/sibling. What they fail to understand is that the
person may not have any control over this trait.
The projections run deep. In advertisements, tele-series,
and movies, introverts are looked down upon and made to feel ashamed of their
personality. Ultimately, they are sent to some personality development coach.
Voila! They become an improved version. Though the scenario is changing and
there is some acceptance among the crowd, there is still scope for improvement.
The literature defines introverts as someone who derives
energy from within. They would think a lot and mentally articulate before
voicing their opinion. They would speak only when probed and would enjoy
working in solace or quiet environment. They generally avoid public settings
because of the fear of being probed, hating the spotlight on themselves. Extroverts
on the other hand are defined as someone who derives energy from others. They
tend to be gregarious, confident, and comfortable in external setting. They are
more outgoing and social. They are assertive and possess better interpersonal
skills. They are more emotionally stable and have greater social dominance.
With respect to performance, extroverts perform well in jobs
that require significant interpersonal interaction. Due to their inbuilt traits,
they can be better leaders. A recent study also found that extroverts tend to
lie more during interviews, can miss deadlines, and skip essential details i.e.
lack attention to detail. Introverts on the other hand perform better on jobs
that require higher analytical skills, more patience, persistence, and high
degree of attention to detail. While studies such as MBTI and Big Five draw
clear distinction between introverts and extroverts, they fail to address the
grey area.
There does exist a third kind – one who are introverts but
can exhibit traits generally associated with extroverts in professional
setting. This kind are comfortable in their skin and can talk to clients,
peers, subordinates efficiently. They can be great leaders and be assertive in
their communication technique. Their introversion helps them to be true
team members, something which can be questionable for extroverts. They
can present themselves well in interviews, be more sociable, take feedback well
and act on it without sulking or any grudges.
This basket of people can create their own vision and can
communicate it well to the team. They perform well in processes that requires
lot of patience and meticulousness and at the same time can present ideas to
internal and external customers with same élan as extroverts.
However, recruiters fail to understand this third type.
Recently a friend of mine almost lost her job because the recruiter thought she
was an introvert. With 6 years of professional work experience, she is a
champion strategist and effective communicator. The HR oblivious to this kind
almost overlooked her skills for the fact that she possessed somewhat
introversion traits.
It is time that we break these barriers and not bucket
people into categories. People should understand that a person can truly have
two sides – one for his/her own self and one exhibited during professional
setting. This dual aspect doesn’t take away from his/her skills to perform at
highest standard at work.
- Article by Pravin Pillai, IPMX 2018-19
Note: The author would like to credit Professor Archana Shukla, Professor in HRM area at IIM Lucknow, for her views expressed during Organizational Behaviour course.
Totally agree with your analysis.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your valuable feedback.
DeleteI totally agree to this, and an easily relate to this good description of different personalities.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your valuable feedback
DeleteTreuly a unique perspective. This needs to be acknowledge by senior leadership team of organisations and HR team.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree. It's about time :)
DeleteIntroversion is generally mistaken for lonliness and Soft spokenness is generally perceived as weakness. Introverts are made to feel guilty about going off by themselves.
ReplyDeleteBut I think that introverts generally come up with their own ways to socialize as they totally understand the importance of letting people/experiences in and reaching out to them. They are not anti-social. They just need more of their lone time to think, reflect and be their best selves.
I also observed that introverts are averse to calling in someone for help because they are fiercely independent. So people get disappointed/offended because they think that introverts dont need them.
Extroverts gotta be a little more compassionate towards such people who spend a considerable amount of time living in their heads :)
True. The fabric of belief has been woven in such a way.
DeleteHope change is around the corner.
Dude, you have got it right this time. A good read!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Sir
DeleteVery well written article! Can I just ask if your friend is an effective communicator, why wasn't she able to communicate her skills to the recruiter? I am sure the recruiter needs to be re/trained on personality development but this shouldn't have been a point of contention.
ReplyDeleteThanks Shweta.
ReplyDeleteShe did clear 4 rounds with different panelists so she displayed her skills effectively. My guess would be that in the final round the HR might have chosen a narrow traditional lens to review her candidature.
Nice analysis ... I totally relate to it
ReplyDeleteThank you, Rohan!
Delete